Foreclosure Hamlet

Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

As regards the issue of the title ( ... when the judge has dismissed a foreclosure case ... )

What you need is the Jurisdictionary course from Frederick Graves (attorney who knows what law is and  knows how to teach it)

See www.wewepeaks.com

The reason why you can't fight the banks in a court of law is because you do not have the tools that apply in a court of law.  So, how could you? 

Christian

The information is provided for educational purposes only.

 

 

 

Views: 3

Comment

You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!

Join Foreclosure Hamlet

Comment by Christian Meister on June 26, 2011 at 1:20am

And what county sheriffs can do in any State (where there is a sheriff), this one lays it out for you

http://www.meisterforsheriff.com/assets/docs-m4s/mack-11-0523-1737-...

they can do it if they are willing, but most will not... so, move to Lee County in 2012 ! ! !

Comment by Christian Meister on June 26, 2011 at 1:20am

if you want to know about how we can deal with the judges' aggressions in Lee County, check this out:

http://www.rulesofcivilprocedure.org/assets/docs-rules-splash/sh-n-...

Comment by Christian Meister on June 26, 2011 at 1:18am
I just found out about an attorney today who was recommended to me - he only charged $250 a month and a $500 upfront retainer.  I have not, during my campaign for sheriff, talked about an attorney (other than a class action attorney in the Fort Lauderdale, Florida, area, because there was nothing to talk about, but this one seems promising.  He got a homeowner's foreclosure case dismissed ! !  I also have some new info for you on www.rulesofcivilprocedure.org.  check it out - lots of resources for you.  Especially for pro se people - it's Florida specific but you get the idea what types rules you need to be familiar with.
Comment by Christian Meister on April 4, 2011 at 2:31pm

Here is my view on the latest news.

 

The judges will continue to violate homeowners (and any other person who comes in as a pro se litigant in any cause of action).

Why?

Because the few homeowners who have attorneys do not object as they are required (hence, malpractice)


Those 1000s of homeowners who cannot afford attorneys do not know how to object.

The assumption will these news stories is that the banks are going to stop foreclosures, - they won't.


The assumption is that judges are going to be judges, as is Judge Arthur Schack in New York, - they are not.

Due Process is not what the television stories and news reports talk about - they only talk about the banks.  Judges have independent power and control.  Worse, people who defend themselves do not know what rules they have to follow (the media certainly is not going to talk about the procedural rules that judges apply or abuse).

And, so, most, if not all, of this will continue.  (Let's have a discussion about this in two years from now to see how many of those cases that are being filed by banks get dismissed and how many homeowners get evicted)

All of this will continue. - Just in fewer numbers.

Of course, I am glad that the media is covering the frauds, and the media should have done this two years ago.

For those who believe that I am a pessimistic, I am not.  The judges and attorneys abuses are negative until proven otherwise. 

I have first-hand experience dealing with the judges and the powerful opposing attorneys, and they will lie, cheat, and bend the rules to get what they want without scrupel.  Anyone who does not believe this is ignorant.  Here, I am  not talking about mortgage foreclosure cases: I am talking about other causes of action (two separate ones) where judges have made up their mind before they open a pro se litigants motion!  AND, THERE ARE NO FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS INVOLVED!.

 

I hope that the readers of this blog are reading this with great care.  My experience with judges and attorneys in litigation (trial court and appellate court (for a period of four years with litigation work in excess of 2,500 hours in writing alone - not counting the many days in agony and frustration about how to deal with the two-faced attorney - allows me to say that little, if anything will change.  The only way it can change is if litigants learn the rules (or get a Sheriff who is going to protect the people's Constitutional rights: See Sheriff Richard Mack v. U.S. to see what I am talking about)!

As an analogy, do you expect me to play a poker game with you if I do not (!) know the rules (!) of the poker game?  If people are jumping up and down today (at the time of this writing) because they are so happy that the media finally talks about the blue, green, and red colors that are printed on the poker cards, it changes "nothing."  Why? - Because media is not talking about the poker rules; they are talking about the darn colors.   And, knowing the colors ALONE, you can't win unless you know the rules.

 

NOTE: This text might contain some exaggerations and, rest assured, there hardly are any absolutes.  So, read this with caution.

 

Regards,

 

Sheriff Candidate Christian Meister

Comment by Christian Meister on April 4, 2011 at 2:22pm
:)
Comment by saving my home in floridah on April 3, 2011 at 2:28am
thank you christian, welcome to the hamlet. your info will help alot of homeowners
i am still in my house today because of your info back in 2010, when my fiasco started and continues.

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Hamlet Stats





Visits
since 12/21/2009

Music

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service