Foreclosure Hamlet

Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

RI Special Master Merrill W. Sherman - Former Banker - Corrupts Federal Foreclosure Order

Now that her body of work is in...let's face it. Merrill W. Sherman is just another fraud.

First, a little background...

U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. issued an Order on August 16, 2011 (the “Order”) staying “all mortgage foreclosure cases currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island .

Below is a copy of the Order.

Special Master 1-5-2012 by chunga85

At the time, Judge McConnell's Order looked very promising. In particular, the quotes below:

"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims…"

"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims completely and or order the appearance of any non-parties, including but not limited to municipal and other government officials and lien holders, that may be essential for a total resolution of the claims;"

That sounds great, doesn't it? Let's get some discovery going here! All these fine institutions seeking to foreclose won't be able to file "protective order" motions and be forced to actually prove they are entitled to foreclose on anybody.

After all, each and every lawsuit filed was done so with great specificity. Not one of them is a boiler-plate "banks are bad" suit. Every plaintiff under the Order is entitled to be heard and none of them have.

Fast forward two years later and let's see if we can identify any problems.

As a part of Special Master Sherman's efforts to get to the bottom of this, she enlisted the services of a technical company to establish a "database". The curious reader may ask "so what is in this database?".

OK, I'll tell you what's in there.

  • The plaintiffs' names and addresses and the amount alleged to be owed.
  • The defendants' names and addresses.
  • The accounting status of the plaintiffs' "Use and Occupancy" payments payable to the "Office of the Special Master".

That's it. There is nothing else.

What happened to the lawsuits? Where did they go? And the allegations made by the plaintiffs? Did they just disappear? It appears that *poof* all of that just vanished and no longer exists.

Let's look again at the authority that has been imbued to the Special Master by Judge McConnell:

"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims…"

"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims completely and or order the appearance of any non-parties, including but not limited to municipal and other government officials and lien holders, that may be essential for a total resolution of the claims;"

As of this moment not one single person has been ordered to do anything. Not one single subpoena has been ordered. There has been absolutely no discovery permitted whatsoever.

None.

The allegations made by the plaintiffs haven't been glossed over; they have been completely ignored!

With this "database" up and running all the "Special Master" has to do is run a report by tapping in the plaintiff's name and WHAMMO.

There's your deadbeat!

I think it's kind of late in this game, but I humbly suggest adding the fields below to the Special Master's "database".

Until then I will refer to it as the Special Master's personal MERS:

  • Mail fraud (state and federal)
  • Wire fraud
  • Multiple FDCPA violations
  • Multiple state debt collection violations
  • Unfair and deceptive acts and practices under state law
  • Conspiracy
  • Money Laundering
  • Probable RICO violations
  • Fraud upon the court and/or Bankruptcy fraud
  • Uttering a fraudulent document
  • Fraudulent conveyance
  • Slander of title
  • Financial institution fraud
  • Securities Fraud
  • Tax Evasion
  • Forgery
  • Identity Theft

 

I'm quite sure this list could go on and on; but you get the point.

How long has this international Ponzi scandal gone on? We've had "robo-gate", state AG's chest-thumping about putting people in jail, "consent order" flops, LIBOR, it's totally insane and it never ends.

We've been beating those horses for so long we're now finding it in our food.

Was it ever realistic to expect anything else out of a banker? At first, I suppose, a banker would seem likely to understand the complexities involved, and the Special Master did receive the benefit of the doubt.

Not anymore. The Special Master has spent zero time looking at any of the bad acts perpetrated by these banks...and has not missed any opportunities at taking pot-shots at the plaintiffs and their counsel.

Here is something to ponder while considering if Merrill W. Sherman was/is the right person for this task.

Merrill W. Sherman

"Ms. Sherman joined the Board of Directors in January 2012 following the Company's acquisition of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc., where she had served as President and Chief Executive Officer of both Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and its subsidiary, Bank Rhode Island, since its formation in 1996. Previously, Ms. Sherman served as President and CEO of two other New England community banks. Ms. Sherman is very active in the Rhode Island community and, in addition to chairing the Board of Trustees of the Rhode Island School of Design, she plays a leadership role as a board member of a number of other non-profit organizations."

Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
Compensation for 2010
Salary $470,786
Restricted stock awards $124,271
All other compensation $21,758
Option awards $39,389
Non-equity incentive plan compensation $272,876
Change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings $651,769
Total Compensation $1,580,849
Options Exercised for 2010
Number of securities underlying options exercisable 25,200
Shares acquired on exercise 22,000
Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
Stock Ownership for 2012
Number of shares owned 14,500

Former BankRI CEO Lands $300/Hour Gig Mediating Foreclosures

Is she really the right person for the job? You tell me.

Personally, I don't think so.

These people are as blinded by their avarice as the Bourbon monarchs once were.

Views: 431

Tags: Banker, Corruption, Foreclosure Fraud, Merril W. Sherman, Special Master

Comment

You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!

Join Foreclosure Hamlet

Comment by KT ~ME~ on March 1, 2013 at 11:22am

Great read Capt!  t.y

Comment by Ace on February 28, 2013 at 11:42pm

Our Elected Officials/Lawmakers/Judges are in cahoots & continue to hire the Foxes(Current/Former Banksters &/or their Reps) to protect the Hen Houses(Courts & Banker docs)...Read On...Friggin Sheeple Should just look Away...

Neil Explains it best here...
http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/elizabeth-warren-warming...

If you start with the premise that the banks lost money, much of what followed makes sense, except for the lack of prosecutions. But if you start with the premise that the basic transaction, the only transaction was that investors advanced money for residential mortgage loans, you start coming up with some very different answers and some thorny political and judicial issues.

If the money came from investors, how did the banks lose money? If the investors took the cash loss, why are the banks being permitted to (a) take the paper loss and (b) collect as though they had a monetary loss? If the rating agencies were bribed, why are they not being prosecuted? If the insurance companies and counterparties to credit default swaps were defrauded, why (a) are there no prosecutions for criminal fraud and (b) why is there no recognition of the lies and fraud committed on homeowners, title companies (unless they were con-conspirators) and their successors as each refi or sale compounded the corruption of our title system?

If the insurance paid off, the CDS and other hedges paid off all to the advantage of the banks, why and how could anyone possibly say that the insurance and other proceeds paid to the banks were not agents for the investor/lenders? If the banks  who are foreclosing claim the authority to do so through agency and powers of attorney and appointment, why doesn’t that road travel both ways? If we are going to allow the insurance money and CDS proceeds to be retained within the financial community why are the banks allowed to maintain balance sheets that are grossly misstated by the value of loans and bonds on which they already collected through insurance and which are valued in the open market at pennies on the dollar rather than 100 cents on the dollar now that these transactions are gradually being repatriated onto the balance sheets and income statements of the banks?

If we prosecute to set an example, what example are we setting when we don’t prosecute?

Comment by jersey girl on February 27, 2013 at 3:50pm

Amazing Capt.!!!   

Comment by Capt. Jack on February 27, 2013 at 1:38pm

I think Judge McConnell is being undermined by the black hats.

Why Should Taxpayers Give Big Banks $83 Billion a Year?

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Hamlet Stats





Visits
since 12/21/2009

Music

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service