Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

Not to offend anybody by taking the light away from Florida, BUT....

More Wells Fargo Woes | Full Deposition of Stanley Silva, Notice of Default Robo-Signer

http://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/21/more-wells-fargo-woes-full-depo...

THIS IS HUGE!!!!!

IN CA people have had a major setback trying to bring these fraudulent foreclosures to light!!!!

I recommend we start a separate ISO Signer for California?

I have already found several Title companies signing Foreclosure documents for Trust Companies which in turn are signing fraudulent foreclosure documents for non-judicial proceedings!

Arizona is full of Leticia Quintana robosigning for MERS while working at Recontrust!!!!!

Leticia Quintana is a Prime example, just ask Beth Findsen Esq. at

http://findsenlaw.wordpress.com/beth-k-findsen-attorney/

In fact, I wouldn't even be surprised if Beth has already depo'd her!

4 members like this

Comment

You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!

Join Foreclosure Hamlet

Comment by Nancy F on May 2, 2012 at 10:40am: Just got a new AOM filed on me and wondering if you have anything on the following names.

Yolanda Rodriguez

Cynthia Romo

Wayne Choe

Vallerie White

and the notory is Linda J Stone...looks to be a new one out of Ventura Co. California.

thanks for any help you can give.

Comment by goi on April 19, 2012 at 6:52pm: I WON my CALIFORNIA house FREE & CLEAR. Here is HOW I DID IT...!!!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/90184879/I-Won-my-House-FREE-CLEAR-Here-s...

My advice to Homeowners:

Don't GO to Court ALONE...!!!!

Comment by Mary Carter on April 1, 2012 at 11:04pm: Need info on a Darlene R. Gomez/ Darlene Real Gomez works or worked for Recontrust out of Simi Valley CA. Signatures and notary info. Whatever you have. Help is so appreciated?

Comment by goi on March 20, 2012 at 11:44am: Good to hear from ya: I could take ‘hours’ explaining my experiences with bogus realtors, self proclaimed expert witnesses, so-called forensic auditors and dozens of attorneys who claim to ‘make the banks cry’ while they try to be a ‘dining room table lawyer’. Most attorneys won’t even take foreclosure cases because the homeowner cannot afford to pay them AND they don’t want a reputation “defending deadbeats” (I’m sure there are many other reasons). , I prevailed in ’1′ house and have if FREE & CLEAR. My only ‘loss’ was a ProSe (self represented) case; [got 'out motioned' by bank] Calif is the TOUGHEST for the homeowner! READ THIS: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/18/MNMD1NG... I am defending ’9′ houses; have used 4 attys; 3 auditors & bought (& ret’d) many ‘Do It Yourself’ foreclosure defense courses. [ALL were junk] DO NOT go into court ProSe against a well financed bank attorney. You will LOSE. Hire your own ‘competent atty’; get a good auditor who has an ‘expert witness’ in their pocket. The one’s that REALLY GET IT are: Atty JASON ESTAVILLO [510-982-3001] and auditor LAWRENCE ASUNCION [650-355-8873]. All others I’ve used were ‘worthless’ (but took my $$ anyway). With these guys the bank will negotiate when they see the strength of your LEGAL TEAM, specific AUDIT, expert witness and CASE documents..! BTW: I am NOT being paid to endorse these guys. They are just GOOD…!!! (Tell Em: Kris in ‘Cally’ sent ya…) Winning a house FREE & CLEAR is a LongShot. The goal is to get the bank to negotiate principal reduction, reduced rate, longer terms or cash for keys. The Pre-Emptive legal Steps you take BEFORE foreclosure starts and the motions made during discovery will determine the outcome. I’ve been through enough trials to know this. Our paralegal has TONS of data on MERS and securitizatoin. Email me if you want to know more about the resources I found and USE….

Comment by Dave LeForge on March 5, 2012 at 4:16pm: I have all kinds of descrepencies on all forms of our loan docs.

Comment by Kim M on February 23, 2012 at 10:11am: Hi Mary, YES! My doc have the same PDFkit.net on them.

Comment by Mary Carter on February 23, 2012 at 12:44am: I recently received " true and correct copies" ( yeah right!) of my Deed of Trust(there were two completely different DOT in the packet)Note, application etc. from B of A. Not only are they not endorsed but they had the audacity to send them with a CREATE AND MANIPULATE software printed on it. Uhhhhh I believe they may have accidentally sent both to me! It states on all pages " Generated by PDFKit.NET Evaluation" Create and manipulate PDF documents and forms with PDFKit.Net! Seriously?! Is this a joke? Does ANYBODY else have this on the documents the bank sends them?

Comment by Kim M on February 15, 2012 at 11:29am: I live in the Las Vegas area. On my loan, the Substitution of trustee naming California Reconveyance as Trustee is signed by MERS Vice President HUEY-JEN CHIU. Two months later, the Notice of Rescission is again signed by HUEY-JEN CHIU but her title is Vice President of California Reconveyance! In my research I have discovered she actually worked for Washington Mutual and now works for Chase. I have also discovered that California Reconveyance, an entity who conducts thousands of foreclosures, is owned by JP Morgnan Chase. In September of 2010, famed ROBO-signer Colleen Irby who signs as an officer of MERS assigned our mortgage to JP Morgan Chase. Her signature is the infamous figure 8 symbol. My attorney and I are fighting this in court. For information or copies of these fraudulent docs please comment or email me at agentkimmoore@gmail.com

Comment by Mary Carter on February 10, 2012 at 2:20am: I sure hope you are right.

Comment by D Tam on February 9, 2012 at 12:46pm: You are all missing the point...This will be settled in the courts not by handing each homeowner a check. For those of us who are in litigation against the banks we are making new law. The judges who sit and hear our cases have a very difficult decision to make because there is no case law to justify what they write. They are putting their necks on an appeal/Supreme Court chopping block. This 'Settlement' has opened the kimono for judges to decide in our favor if they feel the issue is morally justified even though there is no case law to back them up. This is a gift from heaven in the legal system and will cost these banks WAY MORE!!!! over the years than this settlement and will scare the demons from them.

Even though this is a very heated issue...as always...calm heads prevail.