Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure
Although, the anonymous document did not disclose which law firm it came from, we were able to match up the instructions with Ben-Ezra affidavits. For example, in the attached Affidavit As to Attorney’s Fees from U.S. Bank v. Ginyard (Ginyard), line one has the year, 1994, as instructed. Line 3 contains the $150 and $70 dollars mentioned in the instructions. And Line D is the last line of the page. As you can see from the instructions, the paralegals are to then:
We've also attached two other examples from Ayala (Ayala) and Flowers (Flowers). Because the attorney fee affidavits from other firms are different, this identifies the anonymous document as relating to Ben-Ezra affidavits. And because these alleged instructions match the affidavits, it suggests that the instructions are actual instructions being used by the firm.
It is important to understand that these are “expert” affidavits that must be executed by attorneys outside the firm (remember the Cullaros?). So, what these instructions say, is that they are using pre-signed signature pages being notarized later as needed. And they are instructed that they can use signature pages from other cases—just white out the file number on the bottom. And not just on the attorneys’ fees affidavits, but on the AOI (Affidavit of Indebtedness)—the main summary judgment affidavits that were at the center of the robo-signing firestorm. In short, this law firm is robo-signing documents right in their own office.
We've also attached a recent Motion to Cancel (BEK Cancel Sale) sale filed by the Ben-Ezra firm in which they admit that “the affidavits contain errors and that the affiants were not in front of the notary at the time of the notarization,” which corroborates the robo-signing suggested by the anonymous instructions.
Let this serve as notification to Ben-Ezra Katz! Time to report themselves to the judges in all affected cases and also the Florida Bar as per the new Florida Bar order.
Comment
Comment by EB on February 19, 2011 at 8:53pm This is getting ugly. I wonder how all these judges feel knowing that they have granted summary judgment based solely on documents submitted by law firms. How do they now feel knowing that they were enablers( while probably unknowing) to this fraud. How do they now feel knowing that the law firms knew that for the most part most of them are inept and lazy and will make their judgment based solely on presumption instead of reading the pleadings and checking the files. It is a sad day for Florida and the judiciary.
How can you be sitting there and watch humans being thrown out of there house when there was fraud in the origination, fraud in the servicing, and fraud in the foreclosure.
Again I repeat, the only way to straighten out these judges is to go after their E/O insurance and make claims against it. If that is done a couple times, we will see them in private practice where they are either furthering the fraud by working for the mills or educate themselves and defend the home owner under the law
Posted by jersey girl on May 20, 2013 at 7:55am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by Darrell Kanka on May 17, 2013 at 9:40am 19 Comments 7 Likes
Posted by VIRGINIA on May 3, 2013 at 3:54am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by Fraudem Bellator on May 2, 2013 at 6:30pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Started by Patty M in Fraudulent Activity. Last reply by Patty M May 13. 4 Replies 0 Likes
Started by foreclosureweary in Fraudulent Activity. Last reply by enrique May 10. 324 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Bill in Foreclosure Stories. Last reply by Bill May 3. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Bill in Fraudulent Activity May 2. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Solidarity US dot Org in Fraudulent Activity. Last reply by Tim Bryant Apr 14. 2 Replies 0 Likes
© 2013 Created by Admin.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!
Join Foreclosure Hamlet