Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

Today I received my motion back from the New York Court of Appeals with the Following letter: On Oct. 15 2009 and May 11 2010 the Court Determined your motions seeking leave to appeal in the abo…

Today I received my motion back from the New York Court of Appeals with the

Following letter:

On Oct. 15 2009 and May 11 2010 the Court Determined your motions seeking leave to appeal in the above entitled matter. The court also denied you motion for reargument.

(Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman’s October 15^th 2009 decision states

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon

The ground that the order sought does not finally determine

The action within the meaning of the Constitution.)

I went back to the 1^st dept of the Appellate Division for a final determination within the

Meaning of the Constitution and their decision on Feb. 23, 2010 was-

“Motion to determine action within the meaning of the Constitution for purposes of an appeal to the to the Court of Appeal(s) denied.

Before Saxe, J.P. Friedman, Moskowitz, Friedman, Richter ,J.J.

This are the Judges that wrote a 5 page opinion changing all the dates and facts and refused to follow the the law pursuant to:

U.S. SUPREME Court case Elliot v. Piersol

1 Pet. 328,349 26 U.S.328,340 (1828)

Under Federal Law which is applicable to all states

The United States Supreme Court stated that if a

Court is “without authority” it’s judgments and orders

Are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but

Simple void, and form no bar to recovery sought, even prior

To reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no

Justification and all persons concerned in executing such

Judgments or sentences are considered in law as trespassers

I was in Federal Court May 8 1997 thru July 29 1997 when the NY State Court judge without jurisdiction signed the two void ab initio judgments on June30 1997 ( making them a nullity and without latches.)

If I had been in front of honest Judges, the clients with their forged and fraudulent deeds of corrupt attorney Thomas P Malone of Fidelity National Title and of corrupt attorney David K Fiveson of a sham title company he called Coronet Title would have been ousted from my two condos

And if Judge Jonathan Lippman had wanted the Judges in the courts below to

to uphold their oath to the Constitution he had Discretionary Jurisdiction of

taking this appeal. Turns out his grandstanding speeches are a lot of garbage

like a lot of politicians.

1 member likes this

Comment

You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!

Join Foreclosure Hamlet

Comment by marilyn lane on July 6, 2012 at 8:45pm: The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor of New York State
NYS State Capitol Building
Albany, NY 12224



Dear Governor Andrew Cuomo:

                                        Below a copy of my letter to Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman.

                                        Excuse the bad word but I am sure you have used it once or

                                       twice in your life.

                                                                                        June 25 2012

                          Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman

                          20 Eagle Street

                          Albany, New York 12207

                          Judge Lippman:

                          I am in receipt of Andrew W Klein’s letter returning my motion

                          papers asking for the Court of Appeals Discretionary Jurisdiction

                          in an appeal for Constitutional justice against five f---ing lying

                          1^st department appellate judges. (better get use to that language

                          that is how the citizens of the country are talking about the judges

                           on the Internet and with good reason.)

                          Are these five judges Saxe, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman, Richter

                          going to say sorry we lied in our first decision about the dates the case

                          Marilyn Lane v. Astoria Federal S & L was in federal court

                          May 8 1997 thru July 29, 1997 and the two void ab initio foreclosure

                          Judgments of June 30,1997 signed in NY State Court and tell the truth

                          No they are going to keep covering their lies. They made a fool of you

                          in their one word decision and you still trust them. Amazing.

                           The Constitution pursuant to Elliot v. Piersol says these two condos are

                            still my two condos., although the NY Court of Appeals doesn’t care

                            whether their judges war with the Constitution.

                           Procedure wasn’t the problem. If your judges had the smarts and ethics

                           of Judge Arthur Schack, I would have been back in my two properties

                           many motions back.

                            Your court stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from me with their

                            Fraud, so you don’t have to fake the court’s honesty about $65.

                            Your judges destroyed the integrity of the New York courts.



                                                           Truthfully but not respectfully submitted

   (DO GIVE ME YOUR COMMENTS - THAT STOP FOLLOWING MESSAGE IF FROM THE CREEPS AT ASTORIA FEDERAL S & L WITH A SECOND COMPUTER ILLEGALLY USING MY IP                                                                                            Marilyn Helyn Lane

Comment by marilyn lane on June 25, 2012 at 4:13am: our NY courts are labeled differently than other states.

The trial court, the lowest court is named NY Supreme Court

The comes the Appellate Division with the 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd & 4th division depending on where you live.

Then our highest Court is the NY Court of Appeals.

Lippman is chief of the Court of Appeals

The Chief Judge of every state has the responsibility that all the judges below him follow the Constitution and Federal Law decided by the US Supreme Court .

On October 15, 2009 Lippman ruled that the decision by the 1^st department

Is not a final determination within the meaning of the Constitution .

The NY Court of Appeals can take the case in three instances

                        if it is a final determination

                       a Constitutional issue

                       or discretionary jurisdiction when an injustice occurred

                       (such as review or sua sponte (meaning on their own as what happened recently in the Pino case at the Florida Supreme Court. That ruling could effect people

In Florida that had property stolen by fraud.

Here in New York,in response to my going back to the 1^st dept of the Appellate division

Asking for a final determination within the meaning of the Constitution-

the appellate division on February 23 2010 –referring to Lippman’s OCT 15 2009 ruling said:

final determination within the meaning of the Constitution for purpose of an appeal to the court of appeals, denied.

This is ruling against A case decided by the US SUPREME COURT (Elliot v. Piersol)

Absolutely illegal..   NY needs a Chief Judge with b----- that protects our US Constitution. This ruling by the Appellate Division really makes a fool of our Chief judge Lippman, and he still sides with them, expecting me to make another motion

To five appellate court judges that lied about the dates and the law in my first motion to the appellate court.

No way are those five appellate judges going to say, oh we lied now we are going to tell the truth. It is only a gimmick to get more fees for the court.

Florida has it bad NY has it worse. The Constitution says judges with bad behavior can be removed. I would think what is going on in the Court is pretty bad behavior

. We really need to petition for a chief Judge WITH THE QUALITY, BRAINS AND ETHICS OF Judge Arthur Schack.

PLEASE i want comments..forget the stop following message, that keeps showing up because of the 2nd computer tied to my IP by the crooks at Astoria Federal S & L.

Comment by Phred Maldonaldo on June 24, 2012 at 9:27pm: hmmm .... odd that only 1 Appellate judge signed. Here in CA the Appellate rules used to say all three have to sign. I had them reconsider and they reviewed the pleadings and came up with a different finding looking at exactly the same material. They actually got a third shot at the pleadings, and sure enough, I have 3 different findings for the exact same pleadings and body of facts.

I'm sorry your atty didn't think to request a statement of decision for a trip to Supreme.

Comment by marilyn lane on June 24, 2012 at 5:53pm: JUDGES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO OWN PROPERTY.

It makes them bias and always ruling for companies like Fidelity NATIONAL Title and its subsidiaries, and Banks they might be a customer of, in cases before them.

Lets hope the kids of this fraudulent foreclosed generation become the Judges AND Senators of tomorrow and get kama back on the JUDGES and their family when they get old, and feeble and looking for Justice.

We know all the Presidents of this great nation.

Let’s Remember every CHIEF judge that ultimately destroyed this nation. the stop following me message comes from the creeps at astoria federal s & l with a second compuer linked to me ip

send me your comments please.

Comment by marilyn lane on June 24, 2012 at 4:40pm: One side of me is very sad and distraught BUT this making me more of a fighter.

I am angry at this damm NY Chief JUDGE Jonathan LIPPMAN who certainally knows

that every judge in this country gets their position in life because of the Constitution and he

doesn't give a damm whether they follow the law or not.

I'm older than probably most of you. I started out my painting career over fifty years ago at the NY Washington Square Outdoor artshow on the corner of Waverly Place and Macdoogal in Greenwich Village, the street where somesone recently told me is where Judge LIPPMAN lives.

I assume Judge LIPPMNAN owns his property and doesn't rent.

wELL I worked very hard for over fifty years to accumulate two luxury condos in New york City that possession has been stolen by fraudulent and forged deeds.

He got his so the heck with the rest of us. He has absolutely no interest in running a just Court system. Obama thinks he is wonderful Figures.

As I said before don't pay attention to the Stop Following message It comes from the creeps at astoria Federal SAVVINGS AND LOAN ASSOC.

Comment by Sharon on June 24, 2012 at 4:12pm: Not surprising but I'm sorry for you. This is all the more reason for us to stand up for our rights.