Jack dougherty's Friends

View All

Jack dougherty's Discussions

J. TAYLOR'S post re: DOLORES V. BALD

Started May 28, 2011 0 Replies 0 Likes

Regarding: J. TAYLOR Is J. Taylor still a member here?The J. Taylor message box will not SEND. Regarding Taylor's post "4. Mers as nominee for First Florida Home Mtg ( My original lender from 2007) Filed an Assignment 08/12/2010 but notes affective…Continue

The Tender Rule. And the Undertaking Rule.

Started Feb 23, 2011 0 Replies 0 Likes

Regardless of the increasing appearance that the Bank of America is perforated with lender fraud, Bank of America has remained very successful in using the misapplication of two main rules to bar homeowners from access to the courts. The…Continue

Tags: rules, undertaking, cognitive, judicial, capture

Let us know if you find Federal or State case law against courts requiring homeowners to post unaffordable bonds

Started this discussion. Last reply by Jack dougherty Jan 23, 2011. 4 Replies 0 Likes

http://vote4vinceflaherty.org/COURT%20ORDER_BofA_%2011-9-2010.pdf…Continue

View All

Jack dougherty's Page

Profile Information

Which state do you live in? (2 letter): California

How did you find out about this site?: internet

Where are you in the foreclosure process?: Filed a suit in a non-judicial state

How many months have you tried to work with your unresponsive loan servicer?: 12

Need federal or state case law against homeowners being required to post large bonds to enjoin banks when there is clear lender fraud.

Let us know if you find Federal or State case law against homeowners being required to post unaffordable bonds to enjoin banks, especially when there are substantial issues of lender fraud.

We believe there should be no bond requirement for a morgage contract that is void due to lender fraud, or when the amount of the debt is in dispute, because putting the cart before the horse, and requiring an unaffordable bond in advance of a disposition, not only consitutes the court's premature validation of the disputed debt, but can serve only one purpose, and that is to deprive the party of their constitutional right to a hearing.

Comment Wall (8 comments)

You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!

Join Foreclosure Hamlet

At 1:11pm on May 28, 2011, KT said…: Hi Jack

Check here for other signatures... www.whatsignature.com

At 12:00pm on March 14, 2011, tina said…: HI

T. Sevillano is the who signed the Sub-trustee/assignment of DT.

At 7:34pm on December 12, 2010, Jack dougherty said…: Thanks. I found it at http://4closurefraud.org/2010/08/27/full-deposition-of-william-hultman-secretary-and-treasurer-of-merscorp/

At 6:45pm on December 12, 2010, Dan Junk said…: Jack,

Your proof re number of ee's and and certifying officers is in the Hultman depostiion from the NJ Upke case this past April. 0 employees in past 5 years and 20,000 certifying oficers. Should be able to ge it online through a search.

Dan

At 7:35pm on November 18, 2010, Ann Holden said…: Here is his email address.
shaggin@bellsouth.net
Tell him that I sent you. He may be able to help you on the subject of large bonds being required to post.
Ann

At 4:25pm on November 18, 2010, Ann Holden said…: Jack, go over to www.msfraud.org and click on the forum tab. Post your question to the forum, and ask for Bob Schmidt.

Ann