ISO Signers

Comment

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:28pm

http://www.msfraud.org/LAW/Lounge/U.S.-Bank-N.A.-v-Bresler_MERS-doe...

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:28pm

It appears Freddie and Fannie are as much of this shell game crime as MERS is.

http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/2011/12/guest-post-welcome-to-fredd...

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:26pm

I have a great list of robo documents and proof of different signtures and fraud if anyone request them. Shelleystotalbodyworks@comcast.net

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:24pm

CLICK ONTO THIS AND YOU WILL SEE SENATOR ROGER WASHINGTON SENATOR GOODMAN STATE ” THEY DON’T KNOW WHO THE LENDER WAS”? NOTICE THEY ARE CHUCKLING THAT THEIR ARE CONS TESTIFYING TO THIS BS BILL. THEY TOLD US BY EMAIL NOT TO COME!!!! THE BANKERS AND TITLE COMPANIES ARE ALMOST JUMPING OUT OF THEIR SEATS TO SEE THIS BILL PASS. THIS IS GREAT FOR THEIR THEFT OF THE STOLEN HOUSE. SEND A LETTER TO WHO? AND IF THE LENDER DOES NOT DISPUTE IT [SOMETIMES THEY DON’T EVEN KNOW WHO THE LENDER WAS!!!!! AND “SOMETIMES THEY DON’T DISPUTE IT! “NO DISPUTE NO ONE KNOW WHO THE LENDER WAS!CANT FIND THEM DUE TO THE NOTES ARE SUPPOSEDLY IN THE SECURITIES POOLS. THIS WILL FIX THEIR MESS THIS WILL ENABLE THE THIEVES TO SELL THE STOLEN HOUSES AND STOLEN NOTES THAT THE BANKS ARE ALREADY PAID FOR WHEN THEY SUPPOSEDLY CASHED THEM GOT PAID AND PUT THEM INTO THE PSA’S BUT YOU AND I KNOW THEY NEVER GOT TRANSFERRED THEY GOT DESTROYED TO EVADE SECURITIES FRAUD. JUST LISTEN TO THIS BS. THIS IS THE FIRST MEETING ON THIS BILL WE WERE TOLD NOT TO SHOW UP TO.
http://www.tvw.org/index.php?option=com_tvwplayer&eventID=20130...

Here is a link that begins with Stuart Halsan’s testimony.
http://www.tvw.org/index.php?option=com_tvwplayer&eventID=20130...
This is a video of a Washington state senate meeting in Olympia. WA, I and several others were told by Senator Goodman not to show due to the bill was going to be pulled due to it being a bad bill, they had this meeting without us, I believe on purpose. On the second video you will see the attorney for the title association admit there are no notes. He admits the problem lies in the securities pools. He admits if you expect to sell a house by reconvayence with an authentic note You will never be able sell your house. Pushing this BS bill is necessary to close and sale every home due to no, zero, nada, homes well be closed and sold without this BS SB bill 1435. A bill to enable the sale OF STOLEN HOMES. ABSOLUTE ADMISSION OF THE LENDERS DO NOT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND ADMISSION THERE ARE NOT NOTE. NOT EVEN THE SENATORS WILL BE ABLE TO SELL THEIR HOMES EVER.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:24pm

RE: KABOOM SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DONT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSIC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE  FAST FORWARD TO BS SB BILL 1435!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JMf_KwQ2...

Subject: KABOOM SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DONT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSIC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE EVER, Obviously this bill effects all house/property sales not just the ones he claims but all sales of all houses including the stolen houses, and they are all stolen if the lenders dont know who owns the loans and have no authentic notes of proof to reconvey.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:24pm

 

Here is a video of the today’s Executive session passing along SHB 1435.  Every member present gives a hearty “I” to pass along.

 

http://www.tvw.org/index.php?option=com_tvwplayer&eventID=20130...

 

 KABOOM all three videos SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DONT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSIC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE EVER, Obviously this bill effects all house/property sales not just the ones he claims but all sales of all houses including the stolen houses, and they are all stolen if the lenders dont know who owns the loans and have no authentic notes of proof to reconvey.



tips@komo4news.com  hot tips line to KOMO TV I sent this to them

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:23pm

---

BILL SB 1435 l

 KABOOM all three videos SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DONT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSIC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE EVER, Obviously this bill effects all house/property sales not just the ones he claims but all sales of all houses including the stolen houses, and they are all stolen if the lenders dont know who owns the loans and have no authentic notes of proof to reconvey.

: Re: Former Bank of America employee Senator Mark Mullet gives the motion to "do pass" SHB 1435 to the Rules committee

Please write your senators and let thm know that you do not appreciate their
"Aye" vote.  Senator Roach had all the information and she chose to vote this crap bill onto Rules.  That is your first email.

 Former Bank of America employee Senator Mark Mullet gives the motion to "do pass" SHB 1435 to the Rules committee

Senator Mark Mullet, the new member of the Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance Committee, moved SHB 1435 to a do pass (to the Rules committee).

Mark just happens to be a Bank of America alumni.

"Mark was a Managing Director at Bank of America, serving as the Global Head of Foreign Currency Options Trading. This made him responsible for a business spread across three different continents."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Mullet

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:20pm

---

KABOOM all three videos SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DON'T KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSOC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE EVER, Obviously this bill effects all house/property sales not just the ones he claims but all sales of all houses including the stolen houses, and they are all stolen if the lenders dont know who owns the loans and have no authentic notes of proof to reconvey.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:18pm

KABOOM all three videos SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DONT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSIC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE EVER, Obviously this bill effects all house/property sales not just the ones he claims but all sales of all houses including the stolen houses, and they are all stolen if the lenders dont know who owns the loans and have no authentic notes of proof to reconvey.

Ha Senator Pam Roach and the ones on the panel all voted for Bill 1435 this can be a disaster. We need to get everyone to email to these rules committe people and their senators to veto this bill. It will cause massive fraud and theft by theives selling houses without authentic notes and real parties of interest.


 KABOOM all three videos SENATOR GOODMAN STATING THE LENDERS DONT KNOW WHO OWNS THE LOANS AND THE TITLE ASSOC ATTORNEY STATING IF YOU EXPECT TO CLOSE ON A SALE OF A HOUSE WITH NOTES AND THE PARTIES OF INTEREST AND PROPER DOCS YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR HOUSE EVER, Obviously this bill effects all house/property sales not just the ones he claims but all sales of all houses including the stolen houses, and they are all stolen if the lenders dont know who owns the loans and have no authentic notes of proof to reconvey.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:13pm

 

http://www.stellionata.com/in-the-news/38-headlines/7662-120509-jpm...

 This deposiiton page 260-261 states the transfer of notes, allonges, and assignments from WAMU to anyone simply do not exist.  More pages disclose more fraud.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on April 6, 2013 at 1:09pm

This is common, and it does not just happen to the ones allegedly defaulted. Many people losing their homes are were not in default. The default is manufactured. many have had houses paid for and no debt owed fraudulently foreclosed on by this default manufactured factious paperwork.  Many were told to get behind on purpose by the banks in order to qualify for a mod, only to be tricked into foreclosure.  They pull every trick in the book.   The Bloomberg terminal was shut down a couple of months ago, however there are terminals to find this information.  Just harder to find it on the ones now left to our discovery.  Someone had to pay a lot of money to have Bloomberg shut down those terminals.  Attorneys paid three thousand a month for those terminals. A concealment of the truth? Ya think. The notes are all counterfeit and the assignments are all frauds. I will post a copy of an attorney for the title association in Washington, representing the title association, whom should know the truth, telling the senate in Washington State If you expect to reconvey property with authentic notes you will never be able to sell your property ever. He was trying to get the WA state senate to pass a bill skirting around the authentic notes and real parties of interest, that I am fighting.I was sitting right behind him in the senate meeting and dropped my mouth to the floor. I am getting a copy of the transcript of the senate meeting. I have an audo I will post here. The first audio of the first senate meeting on this bill Senator Roger Goodman tells the senate panel, the lenders do not know who owns the loans.  

Comment by Paula Nachman on April 6, 2013 at 12:38pm

Dear All,

I need your help.

An attorney that is helping me fight foreclosure in Virginia found this assignment of his own personal mortgage loan by chance while researching something else at the County Courthouse. He is livid!

He sent it to me for my comments which are included below. 

I suggested sending it on to you (names omitted) because I found something disturbing…..

 

My comments and observations:

Mortgage companies who sell your loan are now required by law to notify you of the transfer of ownership – complete with all the details – I think as of March, 2009, right? Which law was that again - anyone know off the top of your head?

Also please note:  The date of the assignment is 09/13/2012.  It is assigned to Wells Fargo as Trustee for a WAMU Pass-Through Certificate Series 2006- PR1 Trust. THIS TRUST IS DATED 2006.  ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF THESE PASS-THROUGH TRUSTS, THE LOANS MUST BE IN THE TRUST WITHIN 6 MONTHS (I THINK) OF THE DATE OF THE TRUST.  There is NO WAY that they can LEGALLY transfer your loan in 2012 to a trust that was closed, at the latest in 2007.

Also the address for JP Morgan and Wells Fargo as Trustee are right next door to each other and have the same exact phone number.

Compare that to the fact that a Florida company sends this to JP Morgan/Wells Fargo in Louisiana (since when is Monroe, LA the new center of international finance?) for execution of an assignment of a mortgage on a home located in Virginia.  

I searched on the Edgar database (SEC filings) and I cannot find this trust!  I Googled the name of the trust and all I can find is foreclosure notices and actions.

COULD THIS BE A FAKE TRUST – A BEARD – TO HIDE THE TRUE IDENTITIES OF THE TRUE FORECLOSING PARTY OR TO HIDE THE FACT THAT NO ONE CAN FORECLOSE IN THE FIRST PLACE? COULD THIS BE A NEW TREND?

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING ON THIS SPECIFIC TRUST AND SIGNORS?

Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 14, 2013 at 7:18pm

http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/03/14/senate-309-pg-report-jpm...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_and_the_Financial_Crisis:_...

Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 13, 2013 at 3:18pm

Good. My attorney has been deposing the employees that made the statements and evidencing they were going off of third party hearsay therefore were making false statements on assignments to foreclose. She is looking at suing the foreclosing trustee company for the fraud in one of her clients cases.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 13, 2013 at 3:05pm

They can not state something that is not true. If they are visually there verifying the parties signing they are lying. If the parties are making false statements it is fraud and a felony. Did they do this by televised notary?  Where is the copy of the ID?

Comment by victory on March 13, 2013 at 2:58pm

Hi, Shelley 

Yes, I do have signature on file and copy of bond insurance.  

Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 13, 2013 at 2:56pm

Some states dont require a log and all states require a signature when they are licensed at the State Sec so you can email or write a request by mail for a copy of the signature on file and it is almost always very different than the ones on the docs.

Comment by victory on March 13, 2013 at 2:29pm

State of Indiana- does not require a journal book.  If they are insured, it is recommended but not required by law.  My document prepared in Va(property located in Va) signor delaware seal, but notary is Indiana notary.  I send a letter to State of Indiana they found no fault of the notary.  they can notarized document for outside signor provided that they are present with ID.  why would a vp in one state go to another state for a notary?     

Comment by Diane on March 13, 2013 at 2:16pm

A suggestion on the fake notary signatures (which I believe are around 90%), look up the state notary law..   Most states require the actual notary to keep a log of everything they notarize.    Find the statute that requires the log, which is actually public record.     Also, they are required to send a certified copy of their log for a particular day to anyone, upon request and payment of a notary fee (normally $6.00 or 7.00) .

Send a request for a copy of the log to every notary with anything to do with your paperwork.   I would suggest sending Cert Mail - Return Receipt ..   include a money order that you can track for the $5.00 or $6.00 fee to see if it is cashed.

If they don't respond, there is your complaint to the Secretary of State.    If they do respond and your document is not included in their record book .... they are toast and you have some very strong evidence the Affidavit is a fake.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 8, 2013 at 11:32pm

Send number six letter of debt dispute and they wont answer it, they can not. That is a violation of FDCPA law.http://livinglies.wordpress.com/foreclosure-defense-forms/letters-a...

Ask your attorney I am not one.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 71
• Next ›
• Page