Foreclosure Hamlet

Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

ISO Signers

Hook up with others who have the same signatories transferring your home from one financial entity to another or testifying to facts of your alleged loan or testifying to owed attorneys fees or answering interrogatories, providing facts regarding the foreclosure of your home, etc, etc, etc.

The individuals named below are not accused of wrong-doing or fraudulent activity or criminal fabrication of any sort.

Comment

You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!

Join Foreclosure Hamlet

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 9:06pm

opps I lost what I was trying to send and doulbe nothing to you. Be right back.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 9:05pm
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 9:03pm
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 7:13pm

G. Hernadez whom works for RECONTRUST is on the Pierce County Records instrument no.  201007020538 CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST for Ryan Erickson’s deed of trust claiming to be secretary of MERS.  On instrument no. 2009-235820 a Crook County Records department in Oregon, G. Hernandez is a notary witnessing a transfer of assignment from Leticia Quintana a notorious Robo signer on the web, whom works for RECONTRUST. To fraud and conflict of interest parties on one document.  On the King County Records instrument no. 20090831001476, G. Hernandez claims to be the secretary of RECONTRUST signing on a deed of trust.  On Ryan Erickson’s CORPORATE ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST listed above in Pierce County, G. Hernandez almost signed as the secretary of RECONTRUST ALSO.  However the G. Hernandez is crossed out and a Cheryl Lee is rubber stamped in place of G. Hernandez and signed by a party claiming to be Cheryl Lee.  Who knows if it is Cheryl Lee with all the fraud Robo signing.  On the Crook County instrument G. Hernandez the notary witnesses the transfer from MERS to RECONTRUST, fraud and a conflict of interest. Even if G. Hernandez signature on the Assignment of Deed of Trust could somehow be considered valid, MERS could not transfer the NOTE to RECONTRUST OR U.S.BANK, because MERS never ever had an ownership interest in the NOTE. 

            The Assignment of Deed of Trust   could not and did not transfer ownership of the “NOTE to RECONTRUST on July 01, 2010, which is after the alleged debt became non performing.  It is well established that the transfer of a note carries with it the security agreement as incident but the same is not true of the reverse.  Nevertheless, on behalf of RECONTRUST claiming to be a debt collector and as alleged beneficiary by agent U.S. Bank, caused a Notice of Trustee’s Sale to be recorded with the Pierce County Auditor on October 12, 2010 naming RECONTRUST as a debt collector for the beneficiary U.S. Bank for the beneficiary MERS,  claiming to be the beneficiary .    This was RECONTRUST second unlawful notice of Trustee’s Sale, recorded in Pierce County against the property of the Grantors.

            Based upon foregoing/ongoing circumstances; Grantors hereby execute this CANCELATION OF DEED OF TRUST and NOTICE OF LAWFUL SEISIN and may file same for recording with the Pierce County Auditor at any time hereafter without further notice at any time hereafter without further notice Grantees.

 

 

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 7:13pm

more of one of the letters my family has recorded in county records.

In addition to the failure by U.S. BANK to document ownership of the MERS Note,  there is compelling evidence that the RECONTRUST identifying MERS as “lender” may have been fraudulently altered at one or more points in time since October26, 2005.  If so,  the Countrywide  note endorsed into MERS and the security agreement which underlies it would no longer be enforceable even if some party could  now be identified as the owner or holder of it.  Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments. U..S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 .  This fraudulent alteration may include one or more undated endorsement stamps affixed to it by parties unknown on the  original or subsequent copies of it.  RECONTRUST AND US BANK makes false claim to the NOTE, and the deed of trust.  There is no connection in the chain of title connecting U.S. Bank and RECONTRUST legally.  Proof of fraud assignment is attached. RECONTRUST EMPLOYEES TRANSFERING THE DEED OF TRUST FROM THEMSELVES TO THEM SELVES IS A FRAUD AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST.  Also the deed of trust and title have to go  hand in hand and cannot be separated.  Astoundingly there is no legal recorded assignments transfer featuring an endorsement stamp of any kind to U.S.Bank nor RECONTRUST, leading any reasonable person to conclude that the NOTE in blank is not payable to U.S.Bank nor RECONTRUST,  and neither is the separate deed of trust.  Concluding the deed of trust is still only payable to the lender Countrywide only if the NOTE has not been separated from it and the chain of title has not been broken by MERS,  cashed by Countrywide into an empty securities pool, Countrywide being paid in full. 

                        Section 2.01

                                Conveyance of Mortgage Loans.

 

                As promptly as practicable after any transfer of a Mortgage Loan under this Agreement, and in any event within thirty days after the transfer, the Trustee shall (i) affix the Trustee’s name to each assignment of Mortgage, as its assignee, and (ii) cause to be delivered for recording in the appropriate public office for real property records the assignments of the Mortgage to the Trustee, except that, if the Trustee has not received the information required to deliver any assignment of a Mortgage for recording, the Trustee shall deliver it as soon as practicable after receipt of the needed information and in any event within thirty days.  No legitimate re assignment of the deed of trust has been recorded after the recording of the deed of trust on October 10, 2005.    

            The Assignment of Deed of Trust included the following language:  “Together with the Note or Notes therein Described”.   Not only was this trust never entered it was fraudulently put into MERS name by a ROBO signer,  G. Hernandez would have had a hopelessly incurable conflict of interest if he or she had “singing authority” for RECONTRUST and or MERS

( in any of its various forms) at the same time that he or she signed on behalf of MERS. 

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 7:12pm

a copy of a lawful seizen letter ( this is before the Oppenheim Report and The Remicks have failed the Remics have failed the OCC letter dated January 14, 2005 was discovered and WA V RECONTRUST and Delaware V MERS that I would have added) 

  1. Robo-Signer (Updated) | Foreclosure Self-Defense

    Feb 6, 2011 – Jeffrey Stephan, the GMAC employee who was the first identified as a robo-signer, has ... If so, more revelations could only increase the pressure on large banks. ... In the 
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:40pm
  1. Robo-Signer (Updated) | Foreclosure Self-Defense

    Feb 6, 2011 – Jeffrey Stephan, the GMAC employee who was the first identified as a robo-signer, has ... If so, more revelations could only increase the pressure on large banks. ... In the case of a fraudulent
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:39pm

Put your felon or foe on the web as case law the state and foe/fellons and pull up what has been already won in the courts. Case law is won cases.  good luck!

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:38pm
  1. COURT WATCH from Bankers Online.com

    Family Medical Leave Act Federal Preemption Fees Financial Privacy Fraud ...Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. ... In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on April 12, 2002 held that a ...... First, the Watts argued that, if the payoff fee was not prohibited by RESPA, 
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:37pm
  1. Dismissals Due to Lack of Standing - Mortgage Servicing Fraud

    msfraud.org/LAW/Lounge/Standing.html
    MSFraud Forum Crosslinks, Findings and Case citations add to Ohio Federal ... thatstates a hearing is mandatory when dealing with dismissal due to lack of ... The Note and Mortgage attached to the Compliant are made in favor of Washington Mutual, ...Harpster (3/10) (Notary fraud, assignment fraud, fraud upon the court, ...
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:36pm
  1. Statute of Limitations on Debts

    www.creditinfocenter.com/rebuild/statuteLimitations.shtml
    May 2, 2011 – Find out the statute of limitations on debts in your state. ... Promissory Note: You agree to pay on a loan via a written contract, just like the written ...
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:35pm

Go web stopforeclosurefraud and read these articles they will give you hope! and great info.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:33pm
  1. FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA

    stopforeclosurefraud.com/
    Oct 15, 2011 – Foreclosure Laws by State ... IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THESTATE OF DELAWARE ... Thousands more foreclosures on MERS-registeredmortgages have ... Banks Prepare to Settle 
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:32pm
  1. Mortgage Servicing Fraud

    www.msfraud.org/
    State task force recommends new laws, 'best practices' to help homeowners and neighborhoods. ... The settlement proposes to reduce the amount "some" homeowners owe on their ... Chase Accused of Brazen Bankruptcy Fraud ... These "show me the paper" cases have been winding through the 
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:31pm
  1. Foreclosure Defense Nationwide - Mortgage Foreclosure Help ...

    foreclosuredefensenationwide.com/
    Jan 12, 2012 – We previously advised on this website that in a case pending in the ...underlying reality is more complex than that envisioned by the law. ... The court alsostated that “Many borrowers before Oregon courts
Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:24pm

We are living in a cesspool swamp of criminal entities gone wild!!!!  They are being exposed for what they are.  We have to take our country back by diligence and that is studing everything you can look up case law the state and the mortgage fruad upon the court or Chase mortgge fraud or BOA mortgage fraud or GMAC mortgage fraud or Wells Fargo mortgage fraud, use the language used in the case laws.  Follow the attorneys lead that put this cases together for the ones that fit yours.

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:17pm

someone has posted a helpful guide book for Pro se's below. Also look up Case law State of ___Motion for Reconsideration.  Proof of false affirmaiton of lawyers whom it is impossible to have personal knowledge "they were not there!" and non compliance to state CPAlaw nor State Deed of trust laws. and send letter from  Occ and Remics have failed and the Oppenheim report I gave all of ya below. And the Http for Washington state V RECONTRUST AND state of Delaware V MERS and the third one I listed below that just came out after I had pointed this out to all of ya. Good luck keep fighting for our rights!

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:13pm

The worst thing we can do is nothing or give up.  Fight these criminals and I will help when ever I can. 

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:11pm

Dont exspect help in the crime scenes in the district courts. I have called it as it is.  The district court crime scenes.  Send your proof and cases to the Appeals courts where there is proof of justice!!!! Many many reversals and justice being done in the appeals courts.  I have no faith in the lower courts and a lot of faith in the appeals courts.  

Comment by Shelley Erickson on January 20, 2012 at 6:09pm

After the reconsideration motion and they deny it you have ten days to file the appeal  the appeal court makes it easier for ProSe(propria persona's ) and have more honest judges.  I see good things happen in the Appeals courts.  The district court judges are funding their courtrooms with foreclosure fees.  Conflict of interest or what?  They are on the internet boohooeing they are having a hard time keeping their courts open because of loss of foreclosure funds while foreclosures had been stalled.  What a bunch of cra******!

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Hamlet Stats





Visits
since 12/21/2009

Music

Loading…

© 2014   Created by Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service