Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure
Hook up with others who have the same signatories transferring your home from one financial entity to another or testifying to facts of your alleged loan or testifying to owed attorneys fees or answering interrogatories, providing facts regarding the foreclosure of your home, etc, etc, etc.
The individuals named below are not accused of wrong-doing or fraudulent activity or criminal fabrication of any sort.
Comment
Comment by Karima: Firewalker on March 8, 2013 at 10:41pm Now that the 6th DCA ruled foreclosures are debt collections under the FDCPA....if it were me...I would do an FDCPA complaint or even better...an action for Quiet Title...yeah....what a way to win!
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 8, 2013 at 10:34pm Second half to the comment below. I am not an attorney, however this would put the lawyer for One West on the line for knowingly misrepresenting OneWest, which it appears the judge and the One West Bank Lawyer do not wish to establish. I have witnessed ever ytime there is a deposition of any one bank employee fraud and deception have been exposed. I have yet to read a deposition of any one bank employee that has witnessed the banks were not committing fraud and deception. So I find the judge and the West One lawyer not wanting to allow an expert to examine the note on Janets mortgage very telling! and very questionable. My sons case has the lawyers in the hot seat due to that motion.
The Lane Powell firm sent my son a letter asking for him to approve they were representing Countrywide, instead of BOA, RECONTRUST , MERS AND
Countrywide. Which my son objected to approving this and sent the letter into the Appeals court as admission of misrepresentation,
I would like to add in the James McDonald V Onewest Bank, Judge Robert S Lasnik, gave permission for an evidentiary hearing to discover the truth. As expected and as usual the evidentiary hearing made discovery of what appears to be not only one but two counterfeit endorsed by wet stamp notes. I stand as never witnessing any discovery that proves that any one of the banks were not committing fraud and deceit. Judge Lasnik gave both the for-closers and the plaintiffs a chance to prove fraud or not"! Thankyou judge Lasnik. Washington citizens appreciate a fair and unbiased judge willing to prove the truth.. Perhaps the oath of office the judge should have available in his or her chambers should be attached to the motions.
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/
http://new.livestream.com/accounts/2292674/events/1752571
http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2020458364_foreclos...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/127585821/Dr-James-M-Kelley-Declaration-L...
This WA State Case is helpful to all states and the attorneys in this state are very happy over this ruling/http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/KLEM-vs-...
http://deadlyclear.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/bloomberg-terminal-iceb...
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 8, 2013 at 10:33pm This morning on March 8, 2013, I, Shelley Ann Erickson, witnessed Judge Gary R. Tabor in his court room in Thurston County, ruling against a motion to give Janet Reiner and her attorney Ha Dao permission to have Janets securitiezed promissory note examined for authenticity by James Maddison Kelly, whom has been approved to be an expert witness in two other cases. Ha argued this should be welcomed by the court and the West One attorney to put to rest of the world West One was not in the business of fabricating documents. What appeared to be extremely telling of Judge Tabor's bias to West One's firm objection to proving the truth of this alleged document being the original document or "NOT", judge Tabor disappointingly denied the citizens of Washington from discovering West One had standing in the court or "NOT" and weither or "NOT" West One was forging counterfiet documents as one of WEST ONES employees had already testified in
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/
http://new.livestream.com/accounts/2292674/events/1752571
case of wet stamp endorsing photo copies of originals and having more than one original. West One employees have been flat out caught conterfieting notes. Janets case has: http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/01/06/full-deposition-of-north... http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/01/06/full-deposition-of-north... assignments that two NW Trustee employees have testified to admitting they were making false statements on the assignments to Janets mortgage, to what appears to be unlawful siezure of Janets home. What would be the harm if West One has the original note? Why would the judge not want proof of West One having standing.? Is standing important in the court room or "NOT"? West One Attorney testified James Maddison Kelly has a sign at his place of business stating most documents by the banks are frauds. attempting to discredit him as a biased party. When four out of four counties that have been audited Wilkenson County in Texas , Kings County in California, Essex County in Mass, and _______________________________, with all audits stating between 74 percent to 85 percent of the assignments in the county records are invalid frauds and one hundred percent of the PSA's are invalid. James Maddison Kelly's sign appears to be stating the outrageous truth and not a biased statement. In any case it appears Judge Tabor was not willing to chance the truth to come out and West One objected to proving the note was authentic or not and would not leave the note in the courts hands. West Ones lawyer telling the judge he was not comfortable with leaving the note in the courts hands. WHY? The court obviously trust the banks the bank does not trust the judge to have the NOTE Or a possible counterfeit of the note. If I were an attorney I would send a motion of Affirmation of proof of Authority to Represent to the lawyer holding the alleged note or" NOT NOTE", that appears to be a counterfeit the West one attorney does not want exposed.
Comment by Emanuele DeStefano on March 7, 2013 at 7:57pm When making a 12(b)6 motion be certain to have sufficient facts to assert the claims. Rule 11 sanctions also apply to frivolous motions even for pro se litigants. There are countless grounds for attack on cookie cutter foreclosure complaints. Be certain that there are "colorable" grounds for the pre-answer motion.
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 7, 2013 at 6:18pm Sorry not all the article copied. This article below is from livinglies word press. Not me
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 7, 2013 at 6:17pm When in the position of being unable to make the next installment payment, or future scheduled installment payments, prepare for the inevitable claim from the banksters to have the right to foreclosure and enforcement of the NOTE-Mortgage.
1. On the day after the date of the day you are served with the foreclosure lawsuit summons, a critical time clock starts counting down. By the last calendar day of the time-period noted on the summons as the time within which you are to ANSWER the foreclosure complaint, have prepared (1) for mailing via certified mail and (2) filing, in the case noted on the summons in the court docket, a Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted.
1.1 Start counting days on the day after you are served with the summons to court in response to the bank’s foreclosure lawsuit, (all calendar days must be counted). On the last day of the specified time period file your Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. (See Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6)). (Check the rules in the jurisdiction where the foreclosed property is located; if the court has local rules be sure to observe those rules also).
1.2 There is no advantage in filing the motion early. Filing the Rule 12(b)(6) motion suspends the time for filing an ANSWER.
About the Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted:
2. The foreclosure claimant (bankster) is required to establish the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the case by evidence proving a valid cause of action. That proof must be established pursuant to the requirements of meeting the criterion for qualification as “the real party in interest,” and UCC § 3-301, and if applicable UCC § 3-309, and should be affirmatively set forth in the foreclosure complaint.
The lawyers for the foreclosure claimant will fail to establish the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the case in the initial complaint, secure in the presumption that you will not question the bank’s standing to file the foreclosure action.
The lawyers that do this type of sloppy work are incompetent BAR-flys, relying upon the collusion of the BAR-fly judge who will “overlook” this defect in the complaint.
Your ability to zero in on the issue of the bankster’s standing to make a claim in foreclosure from the beginning, will immediately panic the foreclosure complainant. The lawyers who wrote and filed the complaint for the banksters are also subject to sanctions under Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, for filing a case where their client cannot establish themselves as “the real party in interest,” and having the right to enforce the instrument. No valid cause of action. Such complaint, without valid cause of action is frivolous. Ask for sanctions against the BAR-fly lawyers and their law firm.
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 7, 2013 at 6:06pm Homeowners and their lawyers are being held hostage to BK and mods due to corrupt courts with judges willing to turn their court rooms into crime scenes.
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 7, 2013 at 6:04pm If not willing to go to the end, Check You can try to do a BK now and stop this.
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 7, 2013 at 6:03pm What state are you in? We are dealing with organized crime at its worst. You can appeal. Lawyers in Wa are finding the lower courts are corrupt and nothing is done by the rule of law until it is in the WA Supreme court. Need to plan to fight all the way due to the state and district courts are bought.
Comment by bryan thomas koth on March 7, 2013 at 5:34pm WELL I PUT UP A GOOD FIGHT...TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT....I HAD A JURY TRAIL SET AFTER 2 YEARS DEP. DISC. LAWYER AT 250.00 PRE HOUR....NEW JUDGE CAME IN....TOOK AWAY JURY TRIAL....GRANTED A SECOND AND NEW SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR BANK....HOUSE UP FOR ACTION....NEVER EVER ANSWERED OUR DISCOVERY...NO NOTE....BUNK ASSNG MORT...FORGED DOCS....NOPE NO JURY WAS ALLOWED TO SEE THAT....JUST STRAIGHT ROBBED...
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 6, 2013 at 3:21pm http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/03/05/march-6-subcommittee-hea...
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/03/06/testimony-susan-m-wachte...
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/03/06/testimony-of-joshua-rosn...
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/03/05/patrick-russell-wells-fa...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_and_the_Financial_Crisis:_...
HOMEOWNERS CONTINUE TO BE VICTIMS OF THIS CRIME HAVING OUR HOMES UNLAWFULLY SIEZED BY FRAUDS, JUSTICE BLOCKED BY THE VERY JUDGES THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO BE UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW, THEN ADDED AND ABETTED BY SHERIFFS THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO PROTECT US ENABLED AND ALLOWED BY OUR POLITICIANS THAT HAVE THE MEANS TO STOP THIS UNCONSCIONABLE CRIME AGAINST AMERICAN FAMILIES. .
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 5, 2013 at 11:20pm Welcome. Sometimes I do have copies of some depositions and robo docs and declarations that don't cost but not this time.
Comment by Karima: Firewalker on March 5, 2013 at 10:06pm Appreciated, Shelley!
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 5, 2013 at 9:58pm Sorry that was the only way I knew to find it.
Comment by Karima: Firewalker on March 5, 2013 at 9:47pm Ok...I paid for it....thanks....a client needed it....I was trying to find a free copy.
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 5, 2013 at 9:28pm [PDF]
PDF (Thesis whole) - James Cook University
eprints.jcu.edu.au/19027/2/02whole.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
Apr 28, 2010 – I declare that this dissertation is my own work and has not been submitted ...... Harding and Welch, 1980) (6) as the tribe Laticaudini within the subfamily .... waters of Lake Te-nggano on Rennell Island, Solomon Islands (Wolff, ...
welch.publicrecords.com/
Public Records Found For: Renell Welch. View Now.
www.jewishterrorism.com/tgeg-signs-with-renell-listing-bank-as-its-n...
Jan 7, 2012 – In 2010, Renell was the market leader for FQB listings with 65 cases. ..... Jack Welch · Jacob Greenberg alias Mark Zuckerberg Facebook founder and ... Jews Control the Federal Reserve by Majority · Jews declare war on ...
[PDF]
newspapers.rawson.lib.mi.us/chronicle/.../Issues/10-14-1976_6.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Lou Cehrig's Disease. BY DR WILLIAM .1 WELCH ... Federal fundt told and Kcurittei purchited under agrecmenti to renell (correspondi to item 8 above) c. Total loini ...
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 5, 2013 at 9:27pm
Comment by Karima: Firewalker on March 5, 2013 at 9:27pm I saw those., Shelley, thanks...but they either require payment or the doc is actually not there.
:(
Comment by Shelley Erickson on March 5, 2013 at 9:26pm
Comment by Karima: Firewalker on March 5, 2013 at 7:58pm Does anyone have the DECLARATION OF RENELL WELCH??? Needed for an Appeal in WA state.
Thanks in advance!
Posted by Phred Maldonaldo on May 24, 2013 at 11:35am 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by 2 Pirates over 40 on May 23, 2013 at 2:56pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by jersey girl on May 20, 2013 at 7:55am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by Darrell Kanka on May 17, 2013 at 9:40am 21 Comments 7 Likes
Started by foreclosureweary in Fraudulent Activity. Last reply by Foreclosure Pro Se 15 hours ago. 325 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Patty M in Fraudulent Activity. Last reply by Patty M May 13. 4 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Bill in Foreclosure Stories. Last reply by Bill May 3. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Bill in Fraudulent Activity May 2. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Solidarity US dot Org in Fraudulent Activity. Last reply by Tim Bryant Apr 14. 2 Replies 0 Likes
© 2013 Created by Admin.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Foreclosure Hamlet to add comments!
Join Foreclosure Hamlet