Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

HELP NEEDED FOR BANKUNITED INFORMATION

Anyone else with BankUnited? working on case with BankUnited--I know the original bank was BankUnited, FSB, FDIC took it over last year and now the newly formed BankUnited (no relationship to BankUnited FSB as I understand) is listed as Plaintiff--no other information provided on summons--does anyone know the law of a bankrupt bank (as in BankUnited, FSB) and forclosure procedure? somewhere I remember reading that the foreclosure would be on hold until after the bankruptcy is over?

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by foreclosureweary on January 21, 2013 at 4:04pm

Jay, can you send me your email or just come to our meeting this Saturday at the Waldemere fire station (2070 Waldemere St., Sarasota). We are Mortgage Justice and we are Homeownerners helping Homeowners--we fight within the court system--there's lot of support and help--

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by foreclosureweary on January 21, 2013 at 4:06pm

edited already

Permalink Reply by Jay D on January 22, 2013 at 1:28pm

atuinc@hotmail.com - my motion to dismiss was denied today (based on a non negotiable instrement (assignment). now I have 20 days to prepare a defense (which I have based on a fraudulant assignment). need direct and or ideas on how to prepare a defense!

thanks

Permalink Reply by Foreclosure Pro Se on May 9, 2013 at 2:03pm

Has anybody taken the deposition of Rajinder Singh of BankUnited? He is the one who signed the Purchase & Assumption Agreement with the FDIC.

The link below is very interesting. BankUnited admitted to the SEC that the P&AA did not come with a schedule of loan when it was signed in May 2009.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1504008/000104746910010448/f...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by enrique on May 10, 2013 at 5:27pm

Thanks FPS

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Foreclosure Pro Se on May 24, 2013 at 12:19pm

Just released.

Lyttle v. BankUnited (Fla. 4th DCA 2013): Summary Judgment Reversed

Because the original promissory note was not payable to
Appellee or endorsed in blank and because Appellee did not comply with the alternative
requirements as stated in Richards, issues of fact remain to be resolved precluding
entry of summary judgment in Appellee’s favor.

http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2013/052013/5D10-3790.op.pdf