Supporting, Informing & Connecting People in Foreclosure

HELP NEEDED FOR BANKUNITED INFORMATION

Anyone else with BankUnited? working on case with BankUnited--I know the original bank was BankUnited, FSB, FDIC took it over last year and now the newly formed BankUnited (no relationship to BankUnited FSB as I understand) is listed as Plaintiff--no other information provided on summons--does anyone know the law of a bankrupt bank (as in BankUnited, FSB) and forclosure procedure? somewhere I remember reading that the foreclosure would be on hold until after the bankruptcy is over?

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Striker on May 17, 2012 at 7:22am

Seems like everyone is just sitting around waiting for the mess to hit the fan. . .I have a SJ hearing in the 7th district the first of June. . .am anxious to hear your outcome BULitigant.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pro se on May 17, 2012 at 11:23am

Striker, where is that?

Here is a case we all need to watch: 502009CA039650XXXXMB in Palm Beach County. Last month SJ was denied, and the Judge wanted a trial in 30 days. So it is scheduled for next Wednesday. Typical BU case.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Striker on May 17, 2012 at 11:56am

Arpad. . .seventh circ. in Flagler County.

Permalink Reply by Pro se on May 17, 2012 at 11:24am

What state and county you are in?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pro se on May 17, 2012 at 12:45pm

Striker: send me an email: lecso1964@hotmail.com

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Peace on May 21, 2012 at 8:36am

Hi gang, The fdic assigned my DOT & loan to the servicer of a REMIC trust in 2011 because BU,fsb never did it when they sold my loan in 2006 into this trust. Is this legal? The servicer is now trying to fc on us (for the 2nd time) in their name yet say that Deutsche Bank owns the loan - so does this now mean that the loan and DOT are bifurcated? Please, I need help if you guys know anything to do from here. The fdic has stated that they have never owned nor had any interest in our loan yet they assigned it in 2011 to the servicer because the servicer asked them to. None of it seems legal and valid to me. Any ideas???? Thanks gang -

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pro se on May 21, 2012 at 9:54am

Send me an email to Lecso1964@hotmail.com

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Striker on May 21, 2012 at 12:36pm

Here's the problem. . .the judges are not enforcing the statutes requiring the banks to attach all documents including assignments, to the original complaint and they are not interested in making the banks prove, by experts, whether or not the dot signatures are original or forged. By now, we all know that the judges are in the pocket of the banks/politicians. The powers to be have vested interests in asssuring that the masses never control the power structure in these free united states. . .they will dangle a carrot or two just to keep us in place. If we screw up, thats our problem. If the politicians screw up, thats our problem, If the banks screw up, thats our problem.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Striker on May 23, 2012 at 10:30pm

Thanks BU Litig. There might just be something in those designatees worth using.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pro se on May 24, 2012 at 11:39am

I attended a trial yesterday in PBC with BU as a plaintiff. What a show! It ended up in an mistrial. It is a case that we all should watch very closely....